Paul-Hayes

  • Subscribe to our RSS feed.
  • Twitter
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Facebook
  • Digg

Sunday, 23 December 2007

Strictly No Photography

Posted on 21:15 by Unknown
Strictly No Photography is a new photo-sharing site for photographs taken in places where you are not allowed to take them.It also has a great album of photographs of No Photography signs, here.
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to XShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest
Posted in art | No comments
Newer Post Older Post Home

0 comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

Popular Posts

  • It turns out all my dreams are cliches
    Everyone dreams. At about two hours a night, the average person spends six years of their life dreaming.We don't know how or why we drea...
  • Woulda, Coulda, Shoulda
    There's a wonderful expression in French, l'esprit d'escalier. It means "the wit of the staircase", thinking of someth...
  • Making sense of the money mess
    I suspect that most people outside the money industries don't really understand why the financial system collapsed and how pervasive it ...
  • “How may I torture you today?”
    When is torture not torture? When it’s American, of course. Only the masters of doublespeak could come up with the term “Enhanced Interrogat...
  • The Obelisk's sesquicentennial
    The Obelisk in Hyde Park at the intersection of Elizabeth and Bathurst Streets is 150 years old this month.I thought it was just an odd Vict...
  • Making Sensorama
    I’m obsessed with Morton Heilig lately. He’s called “the father of virtual reality” with good reason.When TV sucked the life out of the cine...
  • Exploding dogs? "Oh, it happens"
    This was just posted on ABC News. Any – any! – explanations are welcome.Exploding dogs pose no threat to estate housesThe Northern Territory...
  • Inconspicuous consumption
    The economic downturn and the growing awareness of the consequences of diamond mining have already heralded the death of bling.As the econom...
  • Would you mind if I put you on hold?
    43 minutes spent talking to my phone company’s “care” call-centre in India. It took nine people to answer my ostensibly simple question: Wha...
  • The new princes of pop: a crash course
    If you are a 12-year-old girl you may skip to the next post. The rest of you, pay attention.Meet the tween phenomenon that is the Jonas Brot...

Categories

  • art
  • culture
  • ephemera
  • fashion
  • food
  • history
  • language
  • law
  • media
  • music
  • religion
  • science
  • technology
  • terror

Blog Archive

  • ►  2009 (30)
    • ►  June (1)
    • ►  April (6)
    • ►  March (2)
    • ►  February (6)
    • ►  January (15)
  • ►  2008 (122)
    • ►  December (8)
    • ►  November (7)
    • ►  October (6)
    • ►  September (12)
    • ►  August (16)
    • ►  July (22)
    • ►  June (2)
    • ►  May (1)
    • ►  April (1)
    • ►  March (1)
    • ►  February (14)
    • ►  January (32)
  • ▼  2007 (19)
    • ▼  December (19)
      • What on earth?
      • New Year's Eve in Sydney, apparently
      • 2007: the year in tech
      • 2007: the year in fashion
      • 2007: the year in viral videos
      • 2007: the year in buzzwords
      • 2007: the year in news
      • Spoilt for choice
      • Strictly No Photography
      • The potato: no longer humble
      • Goddamnit!
      • The Obelisk's sesquicentennial
      • Lacroix's Histoires de Mode
      • Colour of the Year 2008
      • The Pit of Death
      • What Would Jesus Wear?
      • Pop til you drop
      • Tom Luscombe, photographer
      • Défense de fumer!
Powered by Blogger.

About Me

Unknown
View my complete profile